A remark on the definability of the Fitting subgroup and the soluble radical
A. Ould Houcine

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the Fitting subgroup and soluble radical of a group are definable, establishing criteria for nilpotency and elementary class, with examples illustrating the boundaries of these properties.
Contribution
It proves that the Fitting subgroup is definable when nilpotent, classifies groups with nilpotent Fitting subgroups of bounded class as elementary, and explores similar results for the soluble radical.
Findings
Fitting subgroup is definable if nilpotent
Groups with nilpotent Fitting subgroup of class ≤ n form an elementary class
Existence of groups with definable but non-nilpotent Fitting subgroup
Abstract
Let be an arbitrary group. We show that if the Fitting subgroup of is nilpotent then it is definable. We show also that the class of groups whose Fitting subgroup is nilpotent of class at most is elementary. We give an example of a group (arbitrary saturated) whose Fitting subgroup is definable but not nilpotent. Similar results for the soluble radical are given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
