The Characteristic Star Formation Histories of Galaxies at Redshifts z~2-7
Naveen A. Reddy, Max Pettini, Charles C. Steidel, Alice E. Shapley,, Dawn K. Erb, and David R. Law

TL;DR
This study investigates the star formation histories of galaxies from redshift 7 to 2, revealing rising SFRs over time, the inadequacy of declining SFH models, and the inefficiency of early star formation in galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the rising nature of galaxy star formation histories and challenges declining SFH assumptions at high redshift.
Findings
SFRs from SED modeling are 5-10x lower than IR+UV estimates for z>2.
SFRs are directly proportional to stellar mass at z~2-3.
Less than 10% of baryons contribute to star formation at z>4.
Abstract
A large sample of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies at 1.4<z<3.7, with complementary imaging in the near- and mid-IR from the ground and from Hubble and Spitzer, is used to infer the average star formation histories (SFHs) of typical galaxies from z~7 to 2. For a subset of 302 galaxies at 1.5<z<2.6, we perform a comparison of star formation rates (SFRs) determined from SED modeling (SFRs[SED]) and those calculated from deep Keck UV and Spitzer/MIPS 24 micron imaging (SFRs[IR+UV]). Exponentially declining SFHs yield SFRs[SED] that are 5-10x lower on average than SFRs[IR+UV], indicating that declining SFHs may not be accurate for typical galaxies at z>2. The SFRs of z~2-3 galaxies are directly proportional to their stellar masses M*, with unity slope---a result that is confirmed with Spitzer/IRAC stacks of 1179 UV-faint (R>25.5) galaxies---for M*>5e8 Msun and SFRs >2 Msun/yr. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
