Ionized gas diagnostics from protoplanetary discs in the Orion Nebula and the abundance discrepancy problem
A. Mesa-Delgado (1,2,3,4), M. N\'u\~nez-D\'iaz (3,4), C. Esteban, (3,4), J. Garc\'ia-Rojas (3,4), N. Flores-Fajardo (5), L. L\'opez-Mart\'in, (3,4), Y. G. Tsamis (6), W. J. Henney (5) ((1) Departamento de, Astronom\'ia y Astrof\'isica, Facultad de F\'isica

TL;DR
This study uses integral field spectroscopy to analyze protoplanetary discs in the Orion Nebula, revealing how high-density gas affects abundance measurements and emphasizing the importance of proper background subtraction for accurate chemical diagnostics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of ionized gas in proplyds, demonstrating the impact of high-density regions on abundance discrepancies and proposing improved methods for chemical abundance determination.
Findings
High-density gas significantly influences emission line fluxes in proplyds.
Proper background subtraction is crucial for accurate abundance measurements.
RL-based abundances are more reliable than CEL-based in high-density environments.
Abstract
We present results from integral field spectroscopy with PMAS. The observed field contains: five protoplanetary discs (also known as proplyds), the high-velocity jet HH 514 and a bowshock. Spatial distribution maps are obtained for different emission line fluxes, the c(H{\beta}) coefficient, electron densities and temperatures, ionic abundances of different ions from collisionally excited lines (CELs), C2+ and O2+ abundances from recombination lines (RLs) and the abundance discrepancy factor of O2+, ADF(O2+). We find that collisional de-excitation has a major influence on the line fluxes in the proplyds. If this is not properly accounted for then physical conditions deduced from commonly used line ratios will be in error, leading to unreliable chemical abundances for these objects. We obtain the intrinsic emission of the proplyds 177-341, 170-337 and 170-334 by a direct subtraction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
