The SDSS-HET Survey of Kepler Eclipsing Binaries: Spectroscopic Dynamical Masses of the Kepler-16 Circumbinary Planet Hosts
Chad F. Bender, Suvrath Mahadevan, Rohit Deshpande, Jason T. Wright,, Arpita Roy, Ryan C. Terrien, Steinn Sigurdsson, Lawrence W. Ramsey, Donald P., Schneider, and Scott W. Fleming

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution spectroscopy to precisely measure the masses of stars in the Kepler-16 binary system, providing a critical test for photometric-dynamical models and advancing understanding of low-mass stellar properties.
Contribution
It presents the first high-precision spectroscopic dynamical mass measurements of Kepler-16's stellar components, validating previous photometric models with improved accuracy.
Findings
Dynamical masses of M_A=0.654±0.017 M_sun and M_B=0.1959±0.0031 M_sun.
Mass-ratio q=0.2994±0.0031, consistent with photometric estimates.
Results are among the most precise for low-mass stars.
Abstract
We have used high-resolution spectroscopy to observe the Kepler-16 eclipsing binary as a double-lined system, and measure precise radial velocities for both stellar components. These velocities yield a dynamical mass-ratio of q=0.2994+-0.0031. When combined with the inclination, i=90.3401+0.0016-0.0019 deg, measured from the Kepler photometric data by Doyle et al. 2011, we derive dynamical masses for the Kepler-16 components of M_A=0.654+-0.017 M_sun and M_B=0.1959+-0.0031 M_sun, a precision of 2.5% and 1.5% respectively. Our results confirm at the ~2% level the mass-ratio derived by Doyle et al. with their photometric-dynamical model, q=0.2937+-0.0006. These are among the most precise spectroscopic dynamical masses ever measured for low-mass stars, and provide an important direct test of the results from the photometric-dynamical modeling technique.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
