Observing Simulated Protostars with Outflows: How Accurate are Protostellar Properties Inferred from SEDs?

TL;DR

This study assesses the accuracy of protostellar properties inferred from SED fitting by comparing synthetic observations from detailed star formation simulations with radiative transfer modeling, revealing significant discrepancies and limitations.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of SED-based protostellar property inference using realistic simulations and advanced radiative transfer post-processing.

Findings

SED models correctly identify evolutionary stages

Discrepancies in disk and stellar parameters are common

Complex gas morphology affects classification and parameter accuracy

Abstract

The properties of unresolved protostars and their local environment are frequently inferred from spectral energy distributions (SEDs) using radiative transfer modeling. We perform synthetic observations of realistic star formation simulations to evaluate the accuracy of properties inferred from fitting model SEDs to observations. We use ORION, an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) three-dimensional gravito-radiation-hydrodynamics code, to simulate low-mass star formation in a turbulent molecular cloud including the effects of protostellar outflows. To obtain the dust temperature distribution and SEDs of the forming protostars, we post-process the simulations using HYPERION, a state-of-the-art Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code. We find that the ORION and HYPERION dust temperatures typically agree within a factor of two. We compare synthetic SEDs of embedded protostars for a range of evolutionary times, simulation resolutions, aperture sizes, and viewing angles. We demonstrate that complex, asymmetric gas morphology leads to a variety of classifications for individual objects as a function of viewing angle. We derive best-fit source parameters for each SED through comparison with a pre-computed grid of radiative transfer models. While the SED models correctly identify the evolutionary stage of the synthetic sources as embedded protostars, we show that the disk and stellar parameters can be very discrepant from the simulated values. Parameters such as the stellar accretion rate, stellar mass, and disk mass show better agreement, but can still deviate significantly, and the agreement may in some cases be artificially good due to the limited range of parameters in the set of model SEDs. Lack of correlation between the model and simulation properties in many individual instances cautions against over-interpreting properties inferred from SEDs for unresolved protostellar sources. (Abridged)