Effect of pH, surface charge and counter-ions on the adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate to the sapphire/solution interface
Ningning Li, Robert K. Thomas, Adrian R. Rennie

TL;DR
This study investigates how pH, surface charge, and counter-ions affect SDS surfactant adsorption on sapphire surfaces, revealing charge-dependent adsorption, layer structure, and ion-specific effects using neutron reflection.
Contribution
It provides detailed insights into the structure and composition of SDS layers on sapphire, highlighting ion-specific influences and the role of surface charge in adsorption behavior.
Findings
Adsorption decreases with increasing pH due to charge reversal.
Layer thickness is approximately 24 Å with 20% water content.
Cesium dodecyl sulfate forms denser, less hydrated layers.
Abstract
The role of ionic interactions between sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, and sapphire surfaces have been studied using specular neutron reflection to determine the structure and composition of adsorbed surfactant layers. Increasing the pH of the solution from 3 to 9 reduces the adsorption by reversing the charge of the alumina. This occurs at lower pH for the R-plane (1 -1 0 2) than the C-plane (0 0 0 1), corresponding to the different points of zero charge. The largest surface excess is about 6.5 micromol m-2, the thickness of the adsorbed layer is about 24 Angstrom and it contains roughly 20% water. The hydrocarbon tails of the surfactant molecules clearly interpenetrate rather than form an ordered bilayer. The structure is similar in either pure water or in 0.1 M NaCl when the surfactant is at the respective critical micelle concentration. Different structures were seen with lithium and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
