
TL;DR
This paper investigates the conduciveness of cellular automaton (CA) rule graphs, analyzing how different edge configurations influence the ease of finding rules with specific properties, which could improve evolutionary algorithms for complex problem-solving.
Contribution
It provides analytical expressions for the conduciveness of CA-rule graphs with various edge sets, including novel random interconnections based on Hamming distance.
Findings
Random sparse interconnections enhance conduciveness.
Analytical formulas for conduciveness are derived.
Potential implications for evolutionary rule discovery.
Abstract
Given two subsets A and B of nodes in a directed graph, the conduciveness of the graph from A to B is the ratio representing how many of the edges outgoing from nodes in A are incoming to nodes in B. When the graph's nodes stand for the possible solutions to certain problems of combinatorial optimization, choosing its edges appropriately has been shown to lead to conduciveness properties that provide useful insight into the performance of algorithms to solve those problems. Here we study the conduciveness of CA-rule graphs, that is, graphs whose node set is the set of all CA rules given a cell's number of possible states and neighborhood size. We consider several different edge sets interconnecting these nodes, both deterministic and random ones, and derive analytical expressions for the resulting graph's conduciveness toward rules having a fixed number of non-quiescent entries. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
