The search for habitable worlds: 1. The viability of a starshade mission
Margaret C. Turnbull, Tiffany Glassman, Aki Roberge, Webster Cash,, Charley Noecker, Amy Lo, Brian Mason, Phil Oakley, John Bally

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of a starshade mission with a 4-m telescope at L2 to detect and characterize Earth-like habitable planets, demonstrating high success probability even under challenging conditions.
Contribution
It presents a detailed analysis of a starshade mission's capabilities, including target selection, realistic constraints, and expected outcomes, advancing the design and feasibility understanding.
Findings
Achieves 95% probability of detecting at least one habitable planet without return visits.
Expected to find about 3 planets within the mission lifetime under various scenarios.
Identifies optimal starshade design parameters balancing cost and technical feasibility.
Abstract
As part of NASA's mission to explore habitable planets orbiting nearby stars, this paper explores the detection and characterization capabilities of a 4-m space telescope plus 50-m starshade located at the Earth-Sun L2 point, a.k.a. the New Worlds Observer (NWO). Our calculations include the true spectral types and distribution of stars on the sky, an iterative target selection protocol designed to maximize efficiency based on prior detections, and realistic mission constraints. We carry out both analytical calculations and simulated observing runs for a wide range in exozodiacal background levels ({\epsilon} = 1 - 100 times the local zodi brightness) and overall prevalence of Earth-like terrestrial planets ({\eta}\oplus = 0.1 - 1). We find that even without any return visits, the NWO baseline architecture (IWA = 65 mas, limiting FPB = 4\times10-11) can achieve a 95% probability of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
