Can filamentary accretion explain the orbital poles of the Milky Way satellites?
M. S. Pawlowski, P. Kroupa, G. Angus, K. S. de Boer, B. Famaey, G., Hensler

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method to analyze satellite galaxy orbital poles and finds that filamentary accretion models are unlikely to explain the Milky Way's satellite distribution, whereas galaxy interaction models are more consistent.
Contribution
A novel analysis technique for orbital pole data is presented, demonstrating that tidal dwarf galaxy formation from galaxy interactions better explains the Milky Way's satellite distribution.
Findings
Filamentary accretion models have less than 0.5% likelihood to match observations.
Isotropic angular momentum distributions are more likely than filamentary models to produce observed poles.
Galaxy interaction models can reproduce the observed satellite orbital pole distribution with up to 90% probability.
Abstract
Several scenarios have been suggested to explain the phase-space distribution of the Milky Way (MW) satellite galaxies in a disc of satellites (DoS). To quantitatively compare these different possibilities, a new method analysing angular momentum directions in modelled data is presented. It determines how likely it is to find sets of angular momenta as concentrated and as close to a polar orientation as is observed for the MW satellite orbital poles. The method can be easily applied to orbital pole data from different models. The observed distribution of satellite orbital poles is compared to published angular momentum directions of subhalos derived from six cosmological state-of-the-art simulations in the Aquarius project. This tests the possibility that filamentary accretion might be able to naturally explain the satellite orbits within the DoS. For the most likely alignment of main…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
