Contrasting Classical and Quantum Vacuum States in Non-Inertial Frames
Timothy H. Boyer

TL;DR
This paper compares classical and quantum vacuum states in non-inertial frames, showing classical zero-point radiation's invariance and questioning the quantum notion of vacuum differences like the Unruh effect.
Contribution
It demonstrates that classical zero-point radiation remains invariant under acceleration, contrasting with quantum vacuum state distinctions, and challenges the physical reality of acceleration-induced heating effects.
Findings
Classical zero-point radiation depends only on geodesic separations.
No physical difference between classical vacua in inertial and accelerated frames.
Questions the existence of Unruh-like heating effects in classical theory.
Abstract
Classical electron theory with classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation (stochastic electrodynamics) is the classical theory which most closely approximates quantum electrodynamics. Indeed, in inertial frames, there is a general connection between classical field theories with classical zero-point radiation and quantum field theories. However, this connection does not extend to noninertial frames where the time parameter is not a geodesic coordinate. Quantum field theory applies the canonical quantization procedure (depending on the local time coordinate) to a mirror-walled box, and, in general, each non-inertial coordinate frame has its own vacuum state. In complete contrast, the spectrum of random classical zero-point radiation is based upon symmetry principles of relativistic spacetime; in empty space, the correlation functions depend upon only the geodesic separations (and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
