Comments on "There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory"

TL;DR

This paper critiques Nagata's claim by demonstrating that alleged inconsistencies in quantum mechanics stem from additional assumptions about observable reality, not from the theory itself.

Contribution

It clarifies that the inconsistencies arise from extra assumptions, not the core quantum mechanics framework, challenging Nagata's conclusions.

Findings

Inconsistencies are due to assumptions about observable reality.

Quantum mechanics itself remains consistent.

Extra assumptions lead to perceived contradictions.

Abstract

In a recent paper, Nagata [1] claims to derive inconsistencies from quantum mechanics. In this paper, we show that the inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions about the reality of observables.