Comment on "The New F_L Measurement from HERA and the Dipole Model"
Dieter Schildknecht

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent measurement of the ratio of proton structure functions, arguing that the claimed model-independent test relies on assumptions and that the results support the existing color-dipole model prediction.
Contribution
It clarifies that the recent upper bound on $F_L/F_2$ is not a model-independent test and reinterprets the measurement as confirmation of the color-dipole model prediction.
Findings
The upper bound depends on an ad hoc assumption.
The measurement supports the prediction $F_L = 0.27 F_2$.
The test is not model-independent.
Abstract
The upper bound on the ratio of the proton structure functions tested in the recent paper "The New Measurement from HERA and the Dipole Model", contrary to what is said therein, does not provide a model-independent "rigorous" experimental test of the color-dipole picture. The validity of the theoretical upper bound depends on an ad hoc assumption on the dipole cross section. -- The analysis in the paper "The New Measurement from HERA and the Dipole Model" can be reinterpreted as an additional confirmation of the absolute model-independent prediction from the color-dipole picture of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
