Assessing Researcher Interdisciplinarity: A Case Study of the University of Hawaii NASA Astrobiology Institute
Michael G. Gowanlock, Rich Gazan

TL;DR
This paper combines bibliometric techniques and machine learning to evaluate and visualize interdisciplinarity among researchers at the UHNAI, identifying collaboration opportunities and assessing research diversity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method integrating bibliometrics with the sequential Information Bottleneck to measure and analyze interdisciplinarity in astrobiology research.
Findings
Most UHNAI researchers are engaged in interdisciplinary work
The method effectively clusters research abstracts by subject categories
Potential collaboration opportunities are identified through analysis
Abstract
In this study, we combine bibliometric techniques with a machine learning algorithm, the sequential Information Bottleneck, to assess the interdisciplinarity of research produced by the University of Hawaii NASA Astrobiology Institute (UHNAI). In particular, we cluster abstract data to evaluate Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge subject categories as descriptive labels for astrobiology documents, assess individual researcher interdisciplinarity, and determine where collaboration opportunities might occur. We find that the majority of the UHNAI team is engaged in interdisciplinary research, and suggest that our method could be applied to additional NASA Astrobiology Institute teams in particular, or other interdisciplinary research teams more broadly, to identify and facilitate collaboration opportunities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
