Rotation rates, sizes, and star formation efficiencies of a representative population of simulated disc galaxies
Ian G. McCarthy, Joop Schaye, Andreea S. Font, Tom Theuns, Carlos S., Frenk, Robert A. Crain, Claudio Dalla Vecchia

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological hydrodynamic simulations to analyze the properties of disc galaxies, successfully reproducing many observed relations and efficiencies, with some discrepancies at low and high mass ends.
Contribution
It demonstrates that standard hydrodynamic simulations with supernova feedback can produce a representative population of disc galaxies matching several key observations.
Findings
Simulations reproduce the observed Tully-Fisher relation.
Simulations match the mass-size relation of disc galaxies.
Predictions include too low star formation in low-mass galaxies and overly concentrated, efficient high-mass galaxies.
Abstract
We examine the rotation rates, sizes, and star formation (SF) efficiencies of a representative population of simulated disc galaxies extracted from the Galaxies-Intergalactic Medium Interaction Calculation (GIMIC) suite of cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. These simulations include efficient, but energetically feasible supernova feedback, but have not been tuned in any way to produce 'realistic' disc galaxies. Yet, they generate a large number of discs, without requiring extremely high resolution. Over the wide galaxy stellar mass range, 9.0 < log10[Mstar (Msun)] < 10.5, the simulations reproduce the observed Tully-Fisher relation, the rotation curves of disc galaxies in bins of stellar mass, the mass-size relation of disc galaxies, the optical rotation to virial circular velocity ratio (Vopt/Vvir), and the SF efficiencies of disc galaxies as inferred from stacked weak lensing and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
