Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
Peter Melchior, Massimo Viola

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how pixel noise impacts weak-lensing shear measurements, identifying biases at multiple stages, and introduces a new robust shear estimator along with open-source tools for improved analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of pixel noise effects on shear estimates and proposes a novel, more robust shear estimator for noisy ellipticity data.
Findings
Pixel noise biases shear estimates by a few tenths to a few percent.
Biases depend on galaxy brightness and ellipticity, with more elliptical galaxies being harder to measure.
A new shear estimator demonstrates improved robustness in noisy conditions.
Abstract
Weak-lensing shear estimates show a troublesome dependence on the apparent brightness of the galaxies used to measure the ellipticity: In several studies, the amplitude of the inferred shear falls sharply with decreasing source significance. This dependence limits the overall ability of upcoming large weak-lensing surveys to constrain cosmological parameters. We seek to provide a concise overview of the impact of pixel noise on weak-lensing measurements, covering the entire path from noisy images to shear estimates. We show that there are at least three distinct layers, where pixel noise not only obscures but biases the outcome of the measurements: 1) the propagation of pixel noise to the non-linear observable ellipticity; 2) the response of the shape-measurement methods to limited amount of information extractable from noisy images; and 3) the reaction of shear estimation statistics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
