
TL;DR
This paper investigates how incorporating estimated remaining travel time affects pedestrian simulation quality, finding that it is more influential than the choice of modeling technique, whether force-based or cellular automata.
Contribution
It demonstrates the importance of travel time estimation in improving pedestrian simulation realism across different modeling approaches.
Findings
Considering travel time improves simulation realism
Travel time consideration outweighs model type effects
Both models benefit from travel time integration
Abstract
This contribution demonstrates the potential gain for the quality of results in a simulation of pedestrians when estimated remaining travel time is considered as a determining factor for the movement of simulated pedestrians. This is done twice: once for a force-based model and once for a cellular automata-based model. The results show that for the (degree of realism of) simulation results it is more relevant if estimated remaining travel time is considered or not than which modeling technique is chosen -- here force-based vs. cellular automata -- which normally is considered to be the most basic choice of modeling approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
