On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices
Julien Carron

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the assumption of Gaussian likelihoods and parameter-dependent covariance matrices in cosmological two-point statistics, highlighting potential violations of statistical bounds and recommending fixed covariance matrices for unbiased inference.
Contribution
It demonstrates that using parameter-dependent covariance matrices with Gaussian likelihoods can artificially inflate Fisher information, and advocates for fixed covariance matrices to ensure conservative and unbiased parameter estimation.
Findings
Artificial information from parameter-dependent covariance matrices can violate Cramér-Rao bounds.
Fisher information does not increase with the number of modes due to non-Gaussian estimator distributions.
Using fixed covariance matrices guarantees conservative and unbiased parameter inference.
Abstract
In this brief paper we revisit the Fisher information content of cosmological power spectra or two-point functions of Gaussian fields in order to comment on the assumption of Gaussian estimators and the use of parameter-dependent covariance matrices for parameter inference in the context of precision cosmology. Even though the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood is motivated by the central limit theorem, we discuss that it leads to Fisher information content that violates the Cram\'er-Rao bound if used consistently, owing to independent but artificial information from the parameter-dependent covariance matrix. At any fixed multipole, this artificial term is shown to become dominant in the case of a large number of correlated fields. While the distribution of the estimators does indeed tend to a Gaussian with a large number of modes, it is shown, however, that its Fisher information…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
