VLBI for Gravity Probe B. III. A Limit on the Proper Motion of the "Core" of the Quasar 3C 454.3
N. Bartel, M. F. Bietenholz, D. E. Lebach, J. I. Lederman, L. Petrov,, R. R. Ransom, M. I. Ratner, and I. I. Shapiro

TL;DR
This study used VLBI observations over several years to measure the proper motion of the quasar 3C 454.3's core, establishing it as a stable reference point for Gravity Probe B with limits on its motion and superluminal jet components.
Contribution
It provides the first precise proper motion limits of 3C 454.3's core relative to the celestial reference frame, confirming its stability for use in high-precision astrometry and space missions.
Findings
Core of 3C 454.3 is stationary within 46-56 micro-arcsec/yr over 7 years.
Jet components exhibit superluminal motion up to 5c.
B2250+194 and B2252+172 are stationary within 15-30 micro-arcsec/yr.
Abstract
We made VLBI observations at 8.4 GHz between 1997 and 2005 to estimate the coordinates of the "core" component of the superluminal quasar, 3C 454.3, the ultimate reference point in the distant universe for the NASA/Stanford Gyroscope Relativity Mission, Gravity Probe B. These coordinates are determined relative to those of the brightness peaks of two other compact extragalactic sources, B2250+194 and B2252+172, nearby on the sky, and within a celestial reference frame (CRF), defined by a large suite of compact extragalactic radio sources, and nearly identical to the International Celestial Reference Frame 2 (ICRF2). We find that B2250+194 and B2252+172 are stationary relative to each other, and also in the CRF, to within 1-sigma upper limits of 15 and 30 micro-arcsec/yr in RA and decl., respectively. The core of 3C 454.3 appears to jitter in its position along the jet direction over…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
