On an Approach to Bayesian Sample Sizing in Clinical Trials
Robb J. Muirhead, Adina I. Soaita

TL;DR
This paper proposes a Bayesian method for determining sample sizes in clinical trials, using posterior probabilities and marginal data distributions, to improve trial success criteria without mixing frequentist concepts.
Contribution
It introduces a proper Bayesian approach for sample size calculation in clinical trials, avoiding frequentist-Bayesian mixing and using posterior probability criteria.
Findings
Demonstrates the approach on a drug superiority trial
Provides a criterion based on posterior probability for trial success
Shows how to select sample sizes using the proposed Bayesian method
Abstract
This paper explores an approach to Bayesian sample size determination in clinical trials. The approach falls into the category of what is often called "proper Bayesian", in that it does not mix frequentist concepts with Bayesian ones. A criterion for a "successful trial" is defined in terms of a posterior probability, its probability is assessed using the marginal distribution of the data, and this probability forms the basis for choosing sample sizes. We illustrate with a standard problem in clinical trials, that of establishing superiority of a new drug over a control.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Computational Drug Discovery Methods
