CANDELS: Correlations of SEDs and Morphologies with Star-formation Status for Massive Galaxies at z ~ 2
Tao Wang, Jia-Sheng Huang, S. M. Faber, Guanwen Fang, Stijn Wuyts, G., G. Fazio, Haojing Yan, Avishai Dekel, Yicheng Guo, Henry C. Ferguson, Norman, Grogin, Jennifer M. Lotz, Benjamin Weiner, Elizabeth J. McGrath, Dale, Kocevski, Nimish P. Hathi, Ray A. Lucas, A.M.Koekemoer

TL;DR
This study analyzes the relationship between spectral energy distributions, morphologies, and star formation in massive galaxies at z ~ 2, revealing correlations between galaxy type, structure, and star formation activity using new HST and Chandra data.
Contribution
It introduces a combined infrared color and morphological classification scheme for massive galaxies at z ~ 2, linking star formation activity with galaxy structure and challenging merger-based formation models.
Findings
Quiescent galaxies are bulge-dominated with high Gini coefficients.
Star-forming galaxies exhibit disk or irregular morphologies.
Disks are common in both quiescent and star-forming massive galaxies at z ~ 2.
Abstract
We present a study on Spectral Energy Distributions, Morphologies, and star formation for an IRAC-selected extremely red object sample in the GOODS Chandra Deep Field-South. This work was enabled by new HST/WFC3 near-IR imaging from the CANDELS survey as well as the deepest available X-ray data from Chandra 4 Ms observations. This sample consists of 133 objects with the 3.6um limiting magnitude of [3.6] = 21.5, and is approximately complete for galaxies with M >10^{11}M_sun at 1.5 < z < 2.5. We classify this sample into two types, quiescent and star-forming galaxies, in the observed infrared color-color ([3.6]-[24] vs K-[3.6]) diagram. The further morphological study of this sample show a consistent result with the observed color classification. The classified quiescent galaxies are bulge dominated and star-forming galaxies in the sample have disk or irregular morphologies. Our observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
