A fundamental problem in our understanding of low mass galaxy evolution
Simone M. Weinmann, Anna Pasquali, Benjamin D. Oppenheimer, Kristian, Finlator, J. Trevor Mendel, Robert A. Crain, Andrea V. Maccio

TL;DR
This paper identifies a fundamental discrepancy in galaxy evolution models, showing they predict too few young, star-forming low mass galaxies and suggesting the need for mechanisms that decouple galaxy growth from halo growth.
Contribution
The study reveals a fundamental flaw in current galaxy formation models, highlighting the positive correlation between sSFR and stellar mass and proposing a new decoupling mechanism.
Findings
Models predict too few young, star-forming low mass galaxies.
A positive correlation exists between sSFR and stellar mass in models.
Decoupling galaxy growth from halo growth is necessary.
Abstract
Recent studies have found a dramatic difference between the observed number density evolution of low mass galaxies and that predicted by semi-analytic models. While models accurately reproduce the z=0 number density, they require that the evolution occurs rapidly at early times, which is incompatible with the strong late evolution found observationally. We report here the same discrepancy in two state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, which is evidence that the problem is fundamental. We search for the underlying cause of this problem using two complementary methods. Firstly, we look for evidence of a different history of today's low mass galaxies in models and observations and we find that the models yield too few young, strongly star-forming galaxies. Secondly, we construct a toy model to link the observed evolution of specific star formation rates (sSFR) with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
