Branching ratios of mesonic and nonmesonic antikaon absorptions in nuclear medium
Takayasu Sekihara, Junko Yamagata-Sekihara, Daisuke Jido, Yoshiko, Kanada-En'yo

TL;DR
This paper theoretically investigates the branching ratios of K^- meson absorption in nuclear matter, highlighting the dominance of Lambda(1405) contributions and comparing mesonic and nonmesonic absorption behaviors.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical analysis of K^- absorption mechanisms in nuclei, emphasizing the role of Lambda(1405) and the effects of nuclear density and kaon momentum.
Findings
Mesonic absorption accounts for about 70% of K^- absorption at saturation density.
Nonmesonic absorption accounts for about 30%, with specific ratios among hyperon-nucleon channels.
Interference effects cause different branching ratios in pi Sigma channels, consistent with experiments.
Abstract
The branching ratios of K^- absorption at rest in nuclear matter are theoretically investigated in order to understand the mechanism of K^- absorption into nuclei. For this purpose mesonic and nonmesonic absorption potentials are evaluated as functions of nuclear density, the kaon momentum and energy from one- and two-body K^- self-energy, respectively. By using a chiral unitary approach for the s-wave Kbar N amplitude we find that both the mesonic and nonmesonic absorption potentials are dominated by the Lambda(1405) contributions. The fraction of the mesonic and nonmesonic absorptions are evaluated to be respectively about 70% and 30% at the saturation density almost independently on the kaon momentum. We also observe different behavior of the branching ratios to pi ^+ Sigma^- and pi^- Sigma^+ channels in mesonic absorption due to the interference between Lambda(1405) and the I=1…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
