The Lifetime and Powers of FR IIs in Galaxy Clusters

TL;DR

This study estimates the lifetime and jet powers of FR II radio galaxies in galaxy clusters, finding that their heating is insufficient to offset cooling, suggesting other mechanisms are involved in cluster thermal regulation.

Contribution

The paper provides the first comprehensive estimates of FR II lifetime and jet power distribution in galaxy clusters, and explores their impact on the intracluster medium.

Findings

FR II lifetime estimated at 1.9 x 10^8 years.

Jet power distribution is log-normal with median 1.1 x 10^37 W.

Jet power correlates with galaxy luminosity and black hole mass.

Abstract

We have identified and studied a sample of 151 FR IIs found in brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) in the MaxBCG cluster catalog with data from FIRST and NVSS. We have compared the radio luminosities and projected lengths of these FR IIs to the projected length distribution of a range of mock catalogs generated by an FR II model and estimate the FR II lifetime to be 1.9 x 10^8 yr. The uncertainty in the lifetime calculation is a factor of two, due primarily to uncertainties in the ICM density and the FR II axial ratio. We furthermore measure the jet power distribution of FR IIs in BCGs and find that it is well described by a log-normal distribution with a median power of 1.1 x 10^37 W and a coefficient of variation of 2.2. These jet powers are nearly linearly related to the observed luminosities, and this relation is steeper than many other estimates, although it is dependent on the jet model. We investigate correlations between FR II and cluster properties and find that galaxy luminosity is correlated with jet power. This implies that jet power is also correlated with black hole mass, as the stellar luminosity of a BCG should be a good proxy for its spheroid mass and therefore the black hole mass. Jet power, however, is not correlated with cluster richness, nor is FR II lifetime strongly correlated with any cluster properties. We calculate the enthalpy of the lobes to examine the impact of the FR IIs on the ICM and find that heating due to adiabatic expansion is too small to offset radiative cooling by a factor of at least six. In contrast, the jet power is approximately an order of magnitude larger than required to counteract cooling. We conclude that if feedback from FR IIs offsets cooling of the ICM, then heating must be primarily due to another mechanism associated with FR II expansion.