The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z < 1
Chris Blake, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, Carlos Contreras, Warrick, Couch, Scott Croom, Darren Croton, Tamara Davis, Michael J. Drinkwater, Karl, Forster, David Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Karl Glazebrook, Ben Jelliffe, Russell, J. Jurek, I-hui Li, Barry Madore, Chris Martin

TL;DR
This study combines galaxy clustering measurements from the WiggleZ survey with other data to precisely map the universe's expansion rate and distance-redshift relation up to redshift 0.73, supporting the cosmological-constant dark energy model.
Contribution
It provides the first joint measurements of the distance-redshift relation and expansion rate at multiple redshifts using galaxy clustering data, improving constraints on cosmic expansion history.
Findings
Measured D_A(z) and H(z) at three redshifts with ~7% precision.
Results are consistent with a cosmological-constant dark energy model.
Expansion rate accelerates at redshift z < 0.7.
Abstract
We perform a joint determination of the distance-redshift relation and cosmic expansion rate at redshifts z = 0.44, 0.6 and 0.73 by combining measurements of the baryon acoustic peak and Alcock-Paczynski distortion from galaxy clustering in the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, using a large ensemble of mock catalogues to calculate the covariance between the measurements. We find that D_A(z) = (1205 +/- 114, 1380 +/- 95, 1534 +/- 107) Mpc and H(z) = (82.6 +/- 7.8, 87.9 +/- 6.1, 97.3 +/- 7.0) km/s/Mpc at these three redshifts. Further combining our results with other baryon acoustic oscillation and distant supernovae datasets, we use a Monte Carlo Markov Chain technique to determine the evolution of the Hubble parameter H(z) as a stepwise function in 9 redshift bins of width dz = 0.1, also marginalizing over the spatial curvature. Our measurements of H(z), which have precision better than 7%…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
