Resistivity of non-Galilean-invariant Fermi- and non-Fermi liquids
H. K. Pal, V. I. Yudson, and D. L. Maslov

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the resistivity in non-Galilean-invariant Fermi liquids and non-Fermi liquids depends on Fermi surface properties, revealing conditions under which the typical T^2 behavior is suppressed or altered.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the conditions affecting T^2 resistivity behavior, emphasizing the role of Fermi surface geometry, dimensionality, and integrability in non-Galilean-invariant systems.
Findings
T^2 resistivity is absent for quadratic spectra in 2D and 3D.
Convex, simply-connected 2D Fermi surfaces suppress T^2 terms due to integrability.
Near quantum critical points, resistivity scales as T^{(D+2)/3} or T^{(D+8)/3}.
Abstract
While it is well-known that the electron-electron (\emph{ee}) interaction cannot affect the resistivity of a Galilean-invariant Fermi liquid (FL), the reverse statement is not necessarily true: the resistivity of a non-Galilean-invariant FL does not necessarily follow a T^2 behavior. The T^2 behavior is guaranteed only if Umklapp processes are allowed; however, if the Fermi surface (FS) is small or the electron-electron interaction is of a very long range, Umklapps are suppressed. In this case, a T^2 term can result only from a combined--but distinct from quantum-interference corrections-- effect of the electron-impurity and \emph{ee} interactions. Whether the T^2 term is present depends on 1) dimensionality (two dimensions (2D) vs three dimensions (3D)), 2) topology (simply- vs multiply-connected), and 3) shape (convex vs concave) of the FS. In particular, the T^2 term is absent for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
