No big deal: introducing roles to reduce the size of ATL models
Sjur Dyrkolbotn, Piotr Ka\'zmierczak, Erik Parmann, Truls Pedersen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a role-based semantics for ATL, reducing model complexity by assigning agents to roles, and demonstrates its advantages, complexity analysis, and equivalence to standard ATL semantics.
Contribution
It presents a novel role-based semantics for ATL, improving model checking efficiency and establishing equivalence with traditional semantics.
Findings
Role-based semantics simplifies ATL models
Model checking complexity is analyzed and optimized
Equivalence with standard ATL semantics is proven
Abstract
In the following paper we present a new semantics for the well-known strategic logic ATL. It is based on adding roles to concurrent game structures, that is at every state, each agent belongs to exactly one role, and the role specifies what actions are available to him at that state. We show advantages of the new semantics, analyze model checking complexity and prove equivalence between standard ATL semantics and our new approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
