Lower Complexity Bounds for Lifted Inference
Manfred Jaeger

TL;DR
This paper establishes fundamental lower bounds on the complexity of lifted inference in probabilistic relational models, showing that efficient polynomial algorithms are unlikely for broad classes of such models, even approximately.
Contribution
It extends existing complexity bounds to weighted, quantifier-free formulas, demonstrating the inherent computational limitations of lifted inference.
Findings
No polynomial lifted inference algorithms exist under common complexity assumptions.
Approximate inference also faces similar complexity limitations.
Results hold even for models without the equality predicate.
Abstract
One of the big challenges in the development of probabilistic relational (or probabilistic logical) modeling and learning frameworks is the design of inference techniques that operate on the level of the abstract model representation language, rather than on the level of ground, propositional instances of the model. Numerous approaches for such "lifted inference" techniques have been proposed. While it has been demonstrated that these techniques will lead to significantly more efficient inference on some specific models, there are only very recent and still quite restricted results that show the feasibility of lifted inference on certain syntactically defined classes of models. Lower complexity bounds that imply some limitations for the feasibility of lifted inference on more expressive model classes were established early on in (Jaeger 2000). However, it is not immediate that these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
