Non-detection of previously reported transits of HD 97658b with MOST photometry
Diana Dragomir, Jaymie M. Matthews, Andrew W. Howard, Victoria Antoci,, Gregory W. Henry, David B. Guenther, John A. Johnson, Rainer Kuschnig,, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Anthony F. J. Moffat, Jason F. Rowe, Slavek M. Rucinski,, Dimitar Sasselov, Werner W. Weiss

TL;DR
Follow-up photometry with MOST did not detect transits of HD 97658b, challenging previous reports, and set upper limits on the planet's size while refining its orbital parameters.
Contribution
This study provides the first non-detection of transits for HD 97658b, constrains its maximum size, and improves orbital parameters using new photometric and radial velocity data.
Findings
No transits detected at reported ephemeris
Transit depth limit corresponds to 2.09 R_Earth
Radial velocity data supports 9.5-day orbital period
Abstract
The radial velocity-discovered exoplanet HD 97658b was recently announced to transit, with a derived planetary radius of 2.93 \pm 0.28 R_{Earth}. As a transiting super-Earth orbiting a bright star, this planet would make an attractive candidate for additional observations, including studies of its atmospheric properties. We present and analyze follow-up photometric observations of the HD 97658 system acquired with the MOST space telescope. Our results show no transit with the depth and ephemeris reported in the announcement paper. For the same ephemeris, we rule out transits for a planet with radius larger than 2.09 R_{Earth}, corresponding to the reported 3\sigma lower limit. We also report new radial velocity measurements which continue to support the existence of an exoplanet with a period of 9.5 days, and obtain improved orbital parameters.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
