Deep Absorption Line Studies of Quiescent Galaxies at z~2: The Dynamical Mass-Size Relation, and First Constraints on the Fundamental plane
S. Toft, A. Gallazzi, A. Zirm, M. Wold, S. Zibetti, C. Grillo, A. Man

TL;DR
This study investigates the structural and dynamical properties of quiescent galaxies at z~2, providing new insights into their mass-size relation, fundamental plane, and dark matter content, with implications for galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It presents the first constraints on the fundamental plane at z~2 and analyzes the dark matter fraction evolution in quiescent galaxies using deep spectroscopic data.
Findings
The dynamical mass-size relation at z~2 shows less offset from local relations than the stellar mass-size relation.
Cosmological simulations agree qualitatively but underestimate dark matter evolution.
The fundamental plane at z~2 requires additional evolution beyond passive stellar aging.
Abstract
We present dynamical and structural scaling relations of quiescent galaxies at z=2, including the dynamical mass-size relation and the first constraints on the fundamental plane (FP). The backbone of the analysis is a new, very deep VLT/X-shooter spectrum of a massive, compact, quiescent galaxy at z=2.0389. We detect the continuum between 3700-22000A and several strong absorption features (Balmer series, Ca H+K, G-band), from which we derive a stellar velocity dispersion of 318 +/- 53 km/s. We perform detailed modeling of the continuum emission and line indices and derive strong simultaneous constraints on the age, metallicity, and stellar mass. The galaxy is a dusty (A_V=0.77 (+0.36,-0.32)) solar metallicity (log(Z/Zsun) = 0.02 (+0.20,-0.41)) post starburst galaxy, with a mean luminosity weighted log(age/yr) of 8.9 +/- 0.1. The galaxy formed the majority of its stars at z>3 and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
