Synthesis dependent characteristics of Sr1-xMnxTiO3 (x=0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.09)
K. R. S. Preethi Meher, C. Bogicevic, Pierre-Eymeric Janolin, K. B., R. Varma

TL;DR
This study compares synthesis methods for Sr1-xMnxTiO3, analyzing phase purity, microstructure, and dielectric properties, revealing the influence of synthesis route and Mn doping level on material characteristics.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive comparison of synthesis routes for Sr1-xMnxTiO3, highlighting how different methods affect phase purity, microstructure, and dielectric behavior.
Findings
Oxalate precipitation yields monophasic samples at 3 and 5 mol % Mn.
Freeze-drying produces nanopowders with 35-65 nm crystallite size.
Microstructure and dielectric properties are significantly influenced by synthesis route.
Abstract
Sr1-xMnxTiO3 (where x = 0.03, 0.05, 0.07 and 0.09) was synthesized via different routes that include solid-state, oxalate precipitation and freeze drying. In oxalate precipitation technique, compositions corresponding to 3 and 5 mol % doping of Mn were monophasic whereas the higher compositions revealed the presence of the secondary phases such as MnO, Mn3O4 etc., as confirmed by high resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The decomposition behavior of the precursors prepared using oxalate precipitation method corresponding to the above mentioned compositions was studied. Nanopowders of compositions pertaining to 5 to 9 mol % of Mn doping were obtained using freeze-drying technique. The average crystallite size of these nanopowders was found to be in the 35 to 65 nm range. The microstructural studies carried out on the sintered ceramics, fabricated using powders synthesized by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
