On the assertion that PCT violation implies Lorentz non-invariance
Michael Duetsch, Jose M. Gracia-Bondia

TL;DR
This paper challenges the assumption that PCT violation necessarily implies Lorentz invariance violation, demonstrating through causal perturbation theory that PCT symmetry can be preserved during renormalization.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical proof that local PCT-invariant interactions can retain PCT symmetry after renormalization, questioning previous assumptions.
Findings
PCT violation does not automatically imply Lorentz invariance violation
PCT symmetry can be maintained during renormalization with local interactions
The evidence linking PCT violation to Lorentz invariance violation remains inconclusive
Abstract
Out of conviction or expediency, some current research programs take for granted that "PCT violation implies violation of Lorentz invariance". We point out that this claim is still on somewhat shaky ground. In fact, for many years there has been no strengthening of the evidence in this direction. However, using causal perturbation theory, we prove here that when starting with a local PCT-invariant interaction, PCT symmetry can be maintained in the process of renormalization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
