Separating intrinsic alignment and galaxy-galaxy lensing
Jonathan Blazek, Rachel Mandelbaum, Uros Seljak, Reiko Nakajima

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new, self-consistent method to measure and constrain intrinsic galaxy alignments in galaxy-galaxy lensing studies, showing that IA contamination is likely below 10%, thus not significantly affecting future surveys.
Contribution
The authors develop an improved, self-consistent technique for measuring intrinsic alignment contamination in galaxy-galaxy lensing, applicable with photometric redshifts, and provide tight constraints on IA effects.
Findings
Intrinsic alignment signal is consistent with zero.
IA contamination is constrained below 10% for certain scales.
More stringent photo-z cuts reduce IA contamination to 1-2%.
Abstract
The coherent physical alignment of galaxies is an important systematic for gravitational lensing studies as well as a probe of the physical mechanisms involved in galaxy formation and evolution. We develop a formalism for treating this intrinsic alignment (IA) in the context of galaxy-galaxy lensing and present an improved method for measuring IA contamination, which can arise when sources physically associated with the lens are placed behind the lens due to photometric redshift scatter. We apply the technique to recent Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) measurements of Luminous Red Galaxy lenses and typical (L*) source galaxies with photometric redshifts selected from the SDSS imaging data. Compared to previous measurements, this method has the advantage of being fully self-consistent in its treatment of the IA and lensing signals, solving for the two simultaneously. We find an IA signal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
