
TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that negative prices for European call options can occur even under no-arbitrage conditions like NFLVR, highlighting limitations of standard no-arbitrage arguments and trading constraints.
Contribution
It reveals that the existence of an equivalent local martingale measure does not guarantee non-negative call prices, challenging common assumptions in financial modeling.
Findings
Negative call prices can occur under NFLVR.
Standard admissibility constraints exclude certain arbitrage strategies.
Market prices may differ from replicating prices despite no-arbitrage conditions.
Abstract
We show that the existence of an equivalent local martingale measure for asset prices does not prevent negative prices for European calls written on positive stock prices. In particular, we illustrate that many standard no-arbitrage arguments implicitly rely on conditions stronger than the No Free Lunch With Vanishing Risk (NFLVR) assumption. The discrepancy between replicating prices and market prices for a contingent claim may be observed in a model satisfying NFLVR since certain trading strategies of buying one portfolio and selling another one are often excluded by standard admissibility constraints.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Economic Policies and Impacts · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
