Equation-of-state dependence of the gravitational-wave signal from the ring-down phase of neutron-star mergers
A. Bauswein (1), H.-T. Janka (1), K. Hebeler (2), A. Schwenk (3,4), ((1) MPI for Astrophysics, Garching, (2) Ohio State University, Columbus, (3), ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, Darmstadt, (4) Technische Universita\"at, Darmstadt)

TL;DR
This study uses simulations of neutron-star mergers to show that the postmerger gravitational-wave peak frequency correlates strongly with neutron star radii, enabling constraints on the high-density equation of state through GW observations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how the postmerger GW peak frequency relates to neutron star properties, offering a method to constrain the high-density EoS from GW data.
Findings
Peak frequency correlates with neutron star radii.
GW detection can measure NS radius within 100-200 meters.
Estimated detection rate ranges from 0.015 to 1.2 events per year.
Abstract
Neutron-star (NS) merger simulations are conducted for 38 representative microphysical descriptions of high-density matter in order to explore the equation-of-state dependence of the postmerger ring-down phase. The formation of a deformed, oscillating, differentially rotating very massive NS is the typical outcome of the coalescence of two stars with 1.35 for most candidate EoSs. The oscillations of this object imprint a pronounced peak in the gravitational-wave (GW) spectra, which is used to characterize the emission for a given model. The peak frequency of this postmerger GW signal correlates very well with the radii of nonrotating NSs, and thus allows to constrain the high-density EoS by a GW detection. In the case of 1.35-1.35 mergers the peak frequency scales particularly well with the radius of a NS with 1.6 , where the maximum deviation from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
