Is the aether entrained by the motion of celestial bodies? What do the experiments tell us?

TL;DR

This paper examines whether celestial bodies entrain the aether and concludes that experimental data support a non-entrained aether theory consistent with Lorentz contraction, challenging the idea of a dragged aether.

Contribution

It provides a critical analysis of experimental evidence against aether entrainment and supports the non-entrained aether hypothesis based on Lorentz contraction.

Findings

Experimental data support non-entrained aether theory.

Entrained aether hypothesis is inconsistent with established experiments.

Reevaluation of Earth's aether drift aligns with Lorentz contraction principles.

Abstract

Even though the concept has evolved and if the designation as aether is improperly regarded as outdated, nobody today considers that the vacuum is empty. However, the nature and the properties of the substratum, which permeates the entire universe, remain for the most part unspecified. For example, divergent opinions are put forward by physicists about a possible dragging of the aether by the translational motion of celestial bodies due to gravitation. We show in this text that such a hypothesis is inconsistent with well established experimental data which, on the contrary, lend support to non-entrained aether theory based on Lorentz contraction. A revaluation of the aether drift to which the Earth is subjected is carried out.