Chemical abundances of distant extremely metal-poor unevolved stars
P. Bonifacio (1), L. Sbordone (2,1,3), E. Caffau (2,1), H.-G. Ludwig, (2,1), M. Spite (1), J. I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez (4,5), N. T. Behara (6), ((1) GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Univ. Paris Diderot, (2) Zentrum, f\"ur Astronomie der Universit\"at Heidelberg

TL;DR
This study confirms the chemical compositions of distant extremely metal-poor stars using high-resolution spectra, validating SDSS metallicity estimates and exploring abundance trends and lithium plateau behavior at low metallicities.
Contribution
First high-resolution analysis of distant EMP stars confirming SDSS metallicity estimates and examining lithium plateau behavior at extremely low metallicities.
Findings
EMP stars confirmed with [Fe/H] <= -3.0
Chemical abundance patterns similar to nearer samples
Lithium abundance supports the meltdown of the Spite plateau
Abstract
Aims: The purpose of our study is to determine the chemical composition of a sample of 16 candidate Extremely Metal-Poor (EMP) dwarf stars, extracted from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). There are two main purposes: in the first place to verify the reliability of the metallicity estimates derived from the SDSS spectra; in the second place to see if the abundance trends found for the brighter nearer stars studied previously also hold for this sample of fainter, more distant stars. Methods: We used the UVES at the VLT to obtain high-resolution spectra of the programme stars. The abundances were determined by an automatic analysis with the MyGIsFOS code, with the exception of lithium, for which the abundances were determined from the measured equivalent widths of the Li I resonance doublet. Results: All candidates are confirmed to be EMP stars, with [Fe/H]<= -3.0. The chemical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
