Red and dead: The progenitor of SN 2012aw in M95
M. Fraser, J. R. Maund, S. J. Smartt, M.-T. Botticella, M. Dall'Ora,, C. Inserra, L. Tomasella, S. Benetti, S. Ciroi, J. J. Eldridge, M. Ergon, R., Kotak, S. Mattila, P. Ochner, A. Pastorello, E. Reilly, J. Sollerman, A., Stephens, F. Taddia, S. Valenti

TL;DR
This paper identifies and characterizes the progenitor of the nearby Type II supernova 2012aw in M95, using pre-explosion imaging to determine its properties and mass, providing insights into massive stellar evolution.
Contribution
The study presents the first direct identification of a supernova progenitor in multiple pre-explosion images, estimating its luminosity and mass, and suggesting dust destruction in the explosion.
Findings
Progenitor is a red supergiant with a luminosity of 5.0-5.6 log L/Lsun.
Progenitor mass estimated between 14 and 26 solar masses.
Evidence of dust destruction in the supernova explosion.
Abstract
Core-collapse supernovae (SNe) are the spectacular finale to massive stellar evolution. In this Letter, we identify a progenitor for the nearby core-collapse SN 2012aw in both ground based near-infrared, and space based optical pre-explosion imaging. The SN itself appears to be a normal Type II Plateau event, reaching a bolometric luminosity of 10 erg s and photospheric velocities of 11,000 \kms\ from the position of the H P-Cygni minimum in the early SN spectra. We use an adaptive optics image to show that the SN is coincident to within 27 mas with a faint, red source in pre-explosion HST+WFPC2, VLT+ISAAC and NTT+SOFI images. The source has magnitudes =26.700.06, =23.390.02, =21.10.2, =19.10.4, which when compared to a grid of stellar models best matches a red supergiant. Interestingly, the spectral energy distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
