Non-Abelian statistics of vortices with non-Abelian Dirac fermions
Shigehiro Yasui, Yuji Hirono, Kazunori Itakura, Muneto Nitta

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that vortices trapping two Dirac fermions with U(2) symmetry exhibit non-Abelian exchange statistics, extending previous single-fermion results and revealing genuine non-Abelian behavior among identical vortices.
Contribution
It extends the analysis of vortex exchange statistics to systems with doublet Dirac fermions, showing non-Abelian braid group representations and identifying genuine non-Abelian statistics among identical vortices.
Findings
Vortices with doublet Dirac fermions exhibit non-Abelian braid group representations.
The results include and generalize previous single-fermion vortex statistics.
Genuine non-Abelian statistics are found among identical vortices with the same number of Dirac fermions.
Abstract
We extend our previous analysis on the exchange statistics of vortices having a single Dirac fermion trapped in each core, to the case where vortices trap two Dirac fermions with U(2) symmetry. Such a system of vortices with non-Abelian Dirac fermions appears in color superconductors at extremely high densities, and in supersymmetric QCD. We show that the exchange of two vortices having doublet Dirac fermions in each core is expressed by non-Abelian representations of a braid group, which is explicitly verified in the matrix representation of the exchange operators when the number of vortices is up to four. We find that the result contains the matrices previously obtained for the vortices with a single Dirac fermion in each core as a special case. The whole braid group does not immediately imply non-Abelian statistics of identical particles because it also contains exchanges between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
