Circumbinary MHD Accretion into Inspiraling Binary Black Holes
Scott C. Noble (1), Bruno C. Mundim (1), Hiroyuki Nakano (1), Julian, H. Krolik (2), Manuela Campanelli (1), Yosef Zlochower (1), Nicol\'as Yunes, (3) ((1) Rochester Institute of Technology, (2) Johns Hopkins University, (3), Montana State University)

TL;DR
This study simulates the magnetohydrodynamic evolution of circumbinary disks around inspiraling binary black holes using advanced approximations, revealing how accretion and luminosity evolve during merger stages.
Contribution
It introduces a novel simulation technique combining 2.5PN and 3.5PN approximations to model the spacetime and binary evolution, providing new insights into disk dynamics during inspiral.
Findings
Binary opens a low-density gap in the disk.
Accretion rate decreases by about 50% during inspiral.
Disk luminosity could be modulated at specific frequencies.
Abstract
As 2 black holes bound to each other in a close binary approach merger their inspiral time becomes shorter than the characteristic inflow time of surrounding orbiting matter. Using an innovative technique in which we represent the changing spacetime in the region occupied by the orbiting matter with a 2.5PN approximation and the binary orbital evolution with 3.5PN, we have simulated the MHD evolution of a circumbinary disk surrounding an equal-mass non-spinning binary. Prior to the beginning of the inspiral, the structure of the circumbinary disk is predicted well by extrapolation from Newtonian results. The binary opens a low-density gap whose radius is roughly two binary separations, and matter piles up at the outer edge of this gap as inflow is retarded by torques exerted by the binary; nonetheless, the accretion rate is diminished relative to its value at larger radius by only about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
