A formal definition and a new security mechanism of physical unclonable functions
Rainer Plaga, Frank Koob

TL;DR
This paper provides a formal definition of physical unclonable functions (PUFs), distinguishes them from related concepts, and introduces a new security mechanism that enables the creation of theoretically uncloneable quantum-PUFs without large secret storage.
Contribution
It offers a precise formal definition of PUFs, clarifies their relation to similar concepts, and proposes a novel security mechanism based on challenge-dependent erasure of information.
Findings
A formal, clear definition of PUFs for security evaluation.
Introduction of a new challenge-dependent erasure security mechanism.
Proposal of a quantum-PUF concept with absolute security.
Abstract
The characteristic novelty of what is generally meant by a "physical unclonable function" (PUF) is precisely defined, in order to supply a firm basis for security evaluations and the proposal of new security mechanisms. A PUF is defined as a hardware device which implements a physical function with an output value that changes with its argument. A PUF can be clonable, but a secure PUF must be unclonable. This proposed meaning of a PUF is cleanly delineated from the closely related concepts of "conventional unclonable function", "physically obfuscated key", "random-number generator", "controlled PUF" and "strong PUF". The structure of a systematic security evaluation of a PUF enabled by the proposed formal definition is outlined. Practically all current and novel physical (but not conventional) unclonable physical functions are PUFs by our definition. Thereby the proposed definition…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
