The relative and absolute timing accuracy of the EPIC-pn camera on XMM-Newton, from X-ray pulsations of the Crab and other pulsars
A. Martin-Carrillo, M. G. F. Kirsch, I. Caballero, M. J. Freyberg, A., Ibarra, E. Kendziorra, U. Lammers, K. Mukerjee, G. Sch\"onherr, M., Stuhlinger, R. D. Saxton, R. Staubert, S. Suchy, A. Wellbrock, N. Webb, M., Guainazzi

TL;DR
This paper assesses the timing accuracy of the XMM-Newton EPIC-pn camera using pulsar observations, demonstrating high precision in both relative and absolute timing, crucial for astrophysical measurements.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the timing calibration of XMM-Newton over ten years, establishing its relative and absolute timing accuracy using multiple pulsars.
Findings
Relative timing accuracy better than 10^{-8}
X-ray pulse peaks precede radio peaks by 306±9 μs
Absolute timing accuracy within ±48 μs
Abstract
Reliable timing calibration is essential for the accurate comparison of XMM-Newton light curves with those from other observatories, to ultimately use them to derive precise physical quantities. The XMM-Newton timing calibration is based on pulsar analysis. However, as pulsars show both timing noise and glitches, it is essential to monitor these calibration sources regularly. To this end, the XMM-Newton observatory performs observations twice a year of the Crab pulsar to monitor the absolute timing accuracy of the EPIC-pn camera in the fast Timing and Burst modes. We present the results of this monitoring campaign, comparing XMM-Newton data from the Crab pulsar (PSR B0531+21) with radio measurements. In addition, we use five pulsars (PSR J0537-69, PSR B0540-69, PSR B0833-45, PSR B1509-58 and PSR B1055-52) with periods ranging from 16 ms to 197 ms to verify the relative timing accuracy.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
