Traditional formation scenarios fail to explain 4:3 mean motion resonances
Hanno Rein, Matthew J. Payne, Dimitri Veras, Eric B. Ford

TL;DR
This study systematically evaluates traditional dynamical formation scenarios for 4:3 mean motion resonances in multi-planet systems, finding none successfully reproduce observed systems, thus challenging existing migration-based theories.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis showing that standard formation scenarios fail to produce observed 4:3 resonant systems, highlighting the need for alternative explanations.
Findings
Traditional scenarios do not form enough 4:3 resonant systems
Migration and scattering models are insufficient for 4:3 resonance formation
Results contrast with successful formation of 2:1 and 3:2 resonances
Abstract
At least two multi-planetary systems in a 4:3 mean motion resonance have been found by radial velocity surveys. These planets are gas giants and the systems are only stable when protected by a resonance. Additionally the Kepler mission has detected at least 4 strong candidate planetary systems with a period ratio close to 4:3. This paper investigates traditional dynamical scenarios for the formation of these systems. We systematically study migration scenarios with both N-body and hydro-dynamic simulations. We investigate scenarios involving the in-situ formation of two planets in resonance. We look at the results from finely tuned planet-planet scattering simulations with gas disk damping. Finally, we investigate a formation scenario involving isolation-mass embryos. Although the combined planet-planet scattering and damping scenario seems promising, none of the above scenarios is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
