The stellar-subhalo mass relation of satellite galaxies

TL;DR

This paper extends the abundance matching technique to better understand the relationship between satellite galaxies and their subhalos, revealing that satellites have less massive subhalos than centrals of the same stellar mass, and that these relations align with observed galaxy distributions.

Contribution

It introduces a modified abundance matching method that accounts for differences between satellite and central galaxy mass relations, improving agreement with observations.

Findings

Satellite subhalo masses are significantly lower than central halo masses for the same stellar mass.

Using observed subhalo mass at observation time reduces uncertainties in the mass relations.

The derived relations match observed satellite mass functions and galaxy correlation functions.

Abstract

We extend the abundance matching technique (AMT) to infer the satellite-subhalo and central-halo mass relations (MRs) of galaxies, as well as the corresponding satellite conditional mass functions (CMFs). We use the observed galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) decomposed into centrals and satellites and the LCDM halo/subhalo mass functions as inputs. We explore the effects of defining the subhalo mass at the time of accretion (m_acc) vs. at the time of observation (m_obs). We test the standard assumption that centrals and satellites follow the same MRs, showing that this assumption leads to predictions in disagreement with observations, specially for m_obs. Instead, when the satellite-subhalo MRs are constrained following our AMT, they are always different from the central-halo MR: the smaller the stellar mass (Ms), the less massive is the subhalo of satellites as compared to the halo of centrals of the same Ms. On average, for Ms<2x10^11Msol, the dark mass of satellites decreased by 60-65% with respect to their masses at accretion time. The resulting MRs for both definitions of subhalo mass yield satellite CMFs in agreement with observations. Also, when these MRs are used in a HOD model, the predicted correlation functions agree with observations. We show that the use of m_obs leads to less uncertain MRs than m_acc, and discuss implications of the obtained satellite-subhalo MR. For example, we show that the tension between abundance and dynamics of MW satellites in LCDM gives if the slope of the GSMF faint-end slope upturns to -1.6.