A Study of Heating and Cooling of the ISM in NGC 1097 with Herschel-PACS and Spitzer-IRS
P. Beirao, L. Armus, G. Helou, P. N. Appleton, J.-D. T. Smith, K. V., Croxall, E. J. Murphy, D. A. Dale, B. T. Draine, M. G. Wolfire, K. M., Sandstrom, G. Aniano, A. D. Bolatto, B. Groves, B. R. Brandl, E. Schinnerer,, A. F. Crocker, J. L. Hinz, H.-W. Rix, R. C. Kennicutt

TL;DR
This study investigates the spatial variation of gas cooling and heating in NGC 1097's nucleus and starburst ring using infrared spectral maps, revealing differences in PAH properties and heating efficiency, and suggesting alternative heating mechanisms for H2 emission.
Contribution
It provides a detailed spatial analysis of gas heating and cooling processes in NGC 1097, highlighting differences between the ring and nuclear regions and proposing non-PDR mechanisms for H2 emission.
Findings
The photoelectric heating efficiency is about 50% lower in the ring than in Enuc N and S.
PAHs in the ring produce twice as much emission per unit mass compared to Enuc S.
Most FIR power in the ring and Enuc S cannot be explained by high-intensity PDRs, indicating alternative heating sources.
Abstract
NGC 1097 is a nearby Seyfert 1 galaxy with a bright circumnuclear starburst ring, a strong large-scale bar and an active nucleus. We present a detailed study of the spatial variation of the far infrared (FIR) [CII]158um and [OI]63um lines and mid-infrared H2 emission lines as tracers of gas cooling, and of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) bands as tracers of the photoelectric heating, using Herschel-PACS, and Spitzer-IRS infrared spectral maps. We focus on the nucleus and the ring, and two star forming regions (Enuc N and Enuc S). We estimated a photoelectric gas heating efficiency ([CII]158um+[OI]63um)/PAH in the ring about 50% lower than in Enuc N and S. The average 11.3/7.7um PAH ratio is also lower in the ring, which may suggest a larger fraction of ionized PAHs, but no clear correlation with [CII]158{\mu}m/PAH(5.5 - 14um) is found. PAHs in the ring are responsible for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
