The reinstatement of funding to the Overwhelmingly Large Telescope Project
Jeremy A. Barber

TL;DR
This paper advocates for reinstating funding to the OWL project, emphasizing the scientific potential of large segmented mirror telescopes like the proposed 100m OWL for exoplanet research.
Contribution
It highlights the scientific benefits of large segmented mirror telescopes and argues for reconsidering the cancellation of the OWL project.
Findings
Large telescopes enable detection of biological components in exoplanet atmospheres.
Advances in optical engineering make 100m class telescopes feasible.
Reinstating OWL could significantly advance astronomical knowledge.
Abstract
While space-based telescopes have had a part to play ultimately I feel that it is telescopes like myself that have contributed the most to pushing the boundaries of our knowledge. With current advances in optical engineering we have the ability to create segmented mirrors of considerable size. The scientific possibilities of a single 100m reflecting telescope are considerable, for example, allowing for the detection of biological components in exoplanet atmospheres. One such project was OWL, a project very close to my heart and one that was sadly cancelled before it even began. In light of the breakthroughs that such an instrument could have given the community I recommend the cancellation of the OWL to be reconsidered and for funding to be reinstated to the project.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Assessment and Management
