
TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how to combine derived equivalences of categories in a diagram to establish derived equivalences of their Grothendieck constructions, generalizing known results and providing new methods for constructing such equivalences.
Contribution
It formulates a method to glue derived equivalences of categories in a diagram to obtain derived equivalences of their Grothendieck constructions, extending previous results.
Findings
Derived equivalences of categories can be glued to produce equivalences of their Grothendieck constructions.
If two algebras are derived equivalent, their path, incidence, and monoid categories are also derived equivalent.
Provides examples of constructing larger derived equivalences from smaller ones.
Abstract
The Grothendieck construction of a diagram of categories can be seen as a process to construct a single category by gluing categories in the diagram together. Here we formulate diagrams of categories as colax functors from a small category to the 2-category of small -categories for a fixed commutative ring . In our previous paper we defined derived equivalences of those colax functors. Roughly speaking two colax functors are derived equivalent if there is a derived equivalence from to for all objects in satisfying some "-equivariance" conditions. In this paper we glue the derived equivalences between and together to obtain a derived equivalence between Grothendieck constructions and , which shows that if colax functors are derived equivalent, then so are their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
