Multidisciplinary Cognitive Content of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Sta\v{s}a Milojevi\'c

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution and disciplinary diversity of nanotechnology through title words in a large bibliographic database, revealing three developmental periods and the multidisciplinary nature of the field.
Contribution
It introduces a method to identify disciplinary components in nanotechnology and provides insights into its evolving cognitive and disciplinary landscape.
Findings
Three distinct periods of cognitive development identified
Only 5% of articles are in dedicated nano journals
Approximately 85% of nano research is multidisciplinary
Abstract
This article examines the cognitive evolution and disciplinary diversity of nanotechnology as expressed through the terminology used in titles of nano journal articles. The analysis is based on the NanoBank bibliographic database of 287,106 nano articles published between 1981 and 2004. We perform multifaceted analyses of title words, focusing on 100 most frequent terms. Hierarchical clustering of title terms reveals three distinct time periods of cognitive development of nano research: formative (1981-1990), early (1991-1998), and current (after 1998). Early period is characterized by the introduction of thin film deposition techniques, while the current period is characterized by the increased focus on carbon nanotube and nanoparticle research. We introduce a method to identify disciplinary components of nanotechnology. It shows that the nano research is being carried out in a number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
