Using effective field theory to analyse low-energy Compton scattering data from protons and light nuclei
Harald W. Griesshammer (George Washington U.), Judith A. McGovern (U., of Manchester), Daniel R. Phillips (Ohio U.), Gerald Feldman (George, Washington U.)

TL;DR
This paper uses chiral effective field theory to analyze low-energy Compton scattering data from protons and light nuclei, extracting nucleon polarisabilities with high precision and discussing future experimental and theoretical directions.
Contribution
It provides new fits to proton and deuteron Compton scattering data using ChiEFT, improving the extraction of nucleon polarisabilities and constraining resonance parameters.
Findings
Proton electric polarisability .7 b1 0.3 (stat) b1 0.2 (Baldin) b1 0.8 (theory)
Proton magnetic polarisability .1 b1 0.3 (stat) b1 0.2 (Baldin) b1 0.8 (theory)
Deuteron and isoscalar polarisabilities consistent with previous results
Abstract
Compton scattering provides important insight into the structure of the nucleon. For photons up to about 300 MeV, it is parameterised by six dynamical dipole polarisabilities which characterise the response of the nucleon to a monochromatic photon of fixed frequency and multipolarity. Their zero-energy limit yields the well-known static electric and magnetic dipole polarisabilities \alpha and \beta, and the four dipole spin polarisabilities. Chiral Effective Field Theory (ChiEFT) describes nucleon, deuteron and 3-He Compton scattering, using consistent nuclear currents, rescattering and wave functions. It can thus also be used to extract useful information on the neutron amplitude from Compton scattering on light nuclei. We summarise past work in ChiEFT on all of these reactions and compare with other theoretical approaches. We also discuss all proton experiments up to about 400 MeV, as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
