The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications of the large-scale two-point correlation function
Ariel G. Sanchez, C.G. Scoccola, A. J. Ross, W. Percival, M. Manera,, F. Montesano, X. Mazzalay, A. J. Cuesta, D. J. Eisenstein, E. Kazin, C. K., McBride, K. Mehta, A. D. Montero-Dorta, N. Padmanabhan, F. Prada, J. A., Rubino-Martin, R. Tojeiro, X. Xu, M. Vargas Magana

TL;DR
This paper uses galaxy clustering data from SDSS-III BOSS combined with other cosmological measurements to tightly constrain standard cosmological parameters, confirming the flat-Lambda CDM model and setting limits on neutrino masses and curvature.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive cosmological parameter constraints using the SDSS-III BOSS DR9 galaxy clustering data combined with CMB, SN, and BAO measurements, confirming the standard model and limiting neutrino masses.
Findings
No significant deviations from flat-Lambda CDM.
Tight constraints on curvature, neutrino masses, and dark energy equation of state.
Detection of a deviation from scale-invariance in the primordial power spectrum.
Abstract
We obtain constraints on cosmological parameters from the spherically averaged redshift-space correlation function of the CMASS Data Release 9 (DR9) sample of the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). We combine this information with additional data from recent CMB, SN and BAO measurements. Our results show no significant evidence of deviations from the standard flat-Lambda CDM model, whose basic parameters can be specified by Omega_m = 0.285 +- 0.009, 100 Omega_b = 4.59 +- 0.09, n_s = 0.96 +- 0.009, H_0 = 69.4 +- 0.8 km/s/Mpc and sigma_8 = 0.80 +- 0.02. The CMB+CMASS combination sets tight constraints on the curvature of the Universe, with Omega_k = -0.0043 +- 0.0049, and the tensor-to-scalar amplitude ratio, for which we find r < 0.16 at the 95 per cent confidence level (CL). These data show a clear signature of a deviation from scale-invariance also in the presence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
