The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Analysis of potential systematics
Ashley J. Ross, Will J. Percival, Ariel G. Sanchez, Lado Samushia,, Shirley Ho, Eyal Kazin, Marc Manera, Beth Reid, Martin White, Rita Tojeiro,, Cameron K. McBride, Xiaoying Xu, David A. Wake, Michael A. Strauss, Francesco, Montesano, Molly E. C. Swanson, Stephen Bailey

TL;DR
This paper investigates systematic uncertainties in galaxy clustering measurements from SDSS-III BOSS data, proposing mitigation techniques to improve the robustness of cosmological constraints derived from large-scale structure observations.
Contribution
It identifies key sources of systematic errors in galaxy clustering data and develops weighting methods to reduce their impact, ensuring more accurate cosmological analyses.
Findings
Systematic errors from stellar density affect large-scale clustering measurements.
Weighting galaxies by surface brightness and stellar density reduces systematics.
Randomly selecting galaxy redshifts minimizes systematic errors in correlation functions.
Abstract
We analyze the density field of galaxies observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) included in the SDSS Data Release Nine (DR9). DR9 includes spectroscopic redshifts for over 400,000 galaxies spread over a footprint of 3,275 deg^2. We identify, characterize, and mitigate the impact of sources of systematic uncertainty on large-scale clustering measurements, both for angular moments of the redshift-space correlation function and the spherically averaged power spectrum, P(k), in order to ensure that robust cosmological constraints will be obtained from these data. A correlation between the projected density of stars and the higher redshift (0.43 < z < 0.7) galaxy sample (the `CMASS' sample) due to imaging systematics imparts a systematic error that is larger than the statistical error of the clustering measurements at scales s >…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
